Skip to main content
· 8/21/2014

Cameron Lanning Cormack v. United States

Citations

  • 118 Fed. Cl. 39
  • 2014 U.S. Claims LEXIS 828

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[V]oluntary disclosure of the content of a privileged 4 attorney communication constitutes waiver of the privilege as to all other such communications on 5 the same subject.”
  • “In particular, courts are concerned with basic notions of fairness, aiming to prevent a party from disclosing communications supporting its position while simultaneously withholding communications that do not.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Charles F. Lettow

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.