· 8/21/2014
Cameron Lanning Cormack v. United States
Citations
- 118 Fed. Cl. 39
- 2014 U.S. Claims LEXIS 828
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[V]oluntary disclosure of the content of a privileged 4 attorney communication constitutes waiver of the privilege as to all other such communications on 5 the same subject.”
- “In particular, courts are concerned with basic notions of fairness, aiming to prevent a party from disclosing communications supporting its position while simultaneously withholding communications that do not.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Charles F. Lettow
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.