Cameo Curtains, Inc. v. PHILIP CAREY CORP.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that limitations period did not begin to run until “damage flowing from the injury [could] fairly be estimated” and stating, without elaboration, that lack of privity did not bar action
• breach of warranty action concerning roofing materials

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).