Skip to main content
· 5/18/2022

Camden Progressive Eldercare Services, Inc. v. Sheila Whitney, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Lillie Whitney

Citations

  • 646 S.W.3d 374
  • 2022 Ark. App. 239

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • determining that our Supreme Court would not consider the argument of the appellant’s counsel due to the failure to provide specific references to the record in violation of a Supreme Court rule
  • determining that our Supreme Court would not consider the argument of the appellant’s counsel due to the failure to provide specific references to the record in violation of a Supreme Court rule
  • determining that our Supreme 14 Court will not consider the argument of the appellant’s counsel due to the failure to 15 provide specific references to the record in violation of a Supreme Court rule

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.