Skip to main content
· 8/18/2003

Camburn v. Smith

Citations

  • 586 S.E.2d 565
  • 355 S.C. 574
  • 2003 S.C. LEXIS 195

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that before visitation may be awarded over a parent’s objection the parent must be shown to be unfit by clear and convincing evidence, or there must be evidence of compelling circumstances
  • requiring a showing either of parental unfitness or compelling circumstances such as significant harm to child in the absence of visitation not merely that child would benefit from visitation
  • requiring a showing either of parental unfitness or compelling circumstances such as significant harm to child in the absence of visitation not merely that child would benefit from visitation
  • stating that where a parent is fit, before visitation can be awarded to a grandparent over the parent’s objection “there must be evidence of compelling circumstances to overcome the presumption that the parental decision is in the child’s best interests”
  • relying on evidence of grandparent unfitness in finding the mother's decision to deny visitation was reasonable
  • reversing award of grandparent visitation when no compelling circumstances were present to overcome the presumption that the decision by the fit parents was in the children's best interests

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moore, Waller, Burnett, Pleicones, Pyle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.