Cambridge Products, Ltd., and Naremco, Inc. v. Penn Nutrients, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that the prevailing party must establish the exceptional nature of a patent infringement action by clear and convincing evidence
• writing that “the exceptional nature of the case must be established by clear and convincing evidence”
• \In the case of awards to prevailing accused infringers . . . 'exceptional cases' are normally those of bad faith litigation or those involving fraud or inequitable conduct by the patentee in procuring the patent.\
• “In the case of awards to prevailing accused infringers ... ‘exceptional cases’ are normally those of bad faith litigation or those involving fraud or inequitable conduct by the patentee in procuring the patent.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).