Skip to main content
· 6/19/2007

Cambridge Holdings Group, Inc. v. Federal Insurance

Citations

  • 489 F.3d 1356
  • 376 U.S. App. D.C. 520
  • 67 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1397
  • 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 14360
  • 2007 WL 1745315

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[Ujnless the procedural requirements of effective service of process have been satisfied, the court lacks personal jurisdiction to act----”
  • “[A] district court order disposing of all claims against all properly served defendants satisfies the requirements of Rule 54(b), even if claims against those not properly served remain unresolved.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Garland, Brown, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.