Camastro v. City of Wheeling

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• plaintiff had no protected property interest for 42 U.S.C. § 1983 due process purposes in obtaining zoning variance for car wash building
• plaintiff had no protected property interest for 42 U.S.C. § 1983 due process purposes in obtaining zoning variance for car wash building
• “plaintiff’s claim for a violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 must be dismissed because plaintiff has no property right in a zoning variance; thus, plaintiff cannot state a claim for relief on the allegation that he has been deprived of a property right without due process of law”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).