Camara v. Attorney General of the United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the two substantive grounds for asylum — i.e., past persecution and well-founded fear of future persecution — are “distinct” doctrines
• “[A] petitioner can establish eligibility for asylum in one of two ways: (1) by showing past persecution, or (2) by showing a well-founded fear that [he or] she would be persecuted in the future....”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).