· 6/19/1984
Camara v. Agsalud
Citations
- 685 P.2d 794
- 67 Haw. 212
- 1984 Haw. LEXIS 110
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that appeal from agency decision entitled to deference only if “consistent with legislative purpose”
- commenting that, in order for an agency’s decision to be granted deference, it must be consistent with the legislative purpose
- commenting that, in order for an agency's decision to be granted deference, it must be consistent with the legislative purpose
- noting that \is particularly true where the law to be applied is not a statute but an administrative rule promulgated by the same agency interpreting it\
- disavowing McGlone to the extent it suggests an agency's conclusions of law are reviewed under the clearly erroneous standard
- disavowing McGlone to the extent it suggests an agency's conclusions of law are reviewed under the clearly erroneous standard
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lum, Nakamura, Padgett, Hayashi, Wakatsuki
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.