Skip to main content
· 6/19/1984

Camara v. Agsalud

Citations

  • 685 P.2d 794
  • 67 Haw. 212
  • 1984 Haw. LEXIS 110

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that appeal from agency decision entitled to deference only if “consistent with legislative purpose”
  • commenting that, in order for an agency’s decision to be granted deference, it must be consistent with the legislative purpose
  • commenting that, in order for an agency's decision to be granted deference, it must be consistent with the legislative purpose
  • noting that \is particularly true where the law to be applied is not a statute but an administrative rule promulgated by the same agency interpreting it\
  • disavowing McGlone to the extent it suggests an agency's conclusions of law are reviewed under the clearly erroneous standard
  • disavowing McGlone to the extent it suggests an agency's conclusions of law are reviewed under the clearly erroneous standard

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lum, Nakamura, Padgett, Hayashi, Wakatsuki

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.