Camacho v. Martin (In Re Martin)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a “reckless disregard of both the serious nature of the information sought and the necessary attention to detail and accuracy in answering may give rise to the level of fraudulent intent necessary to bar a discharge”
• describing the debtor as either fully aware of the “seriousness of the Financial Statements, or [ ] reckless in failing to comprehend their import .. .”
• describing the debtor as either fully aware of the “seriousness of the Financial Statements, or [] reckless in failing to comprehend their import . . .”
• appellate court found clear and convincing evidence that the debtor recklessly disregarded the seriousness of the information sought in the Statement of Financial Affairs, as well as the detail and accuracy called for, when he failed to list three bank accounts and other transfers
• unpublished opinion by Judge Finesilver

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).