Skip to main content
· 9/14/2006

Camacho v. AUTO. CLUB OF SO. CALIFORNIA

Citations

  • 48 Cal. Rptr. 3d 770
  • 142 Cal. App. 4th 1394
  • 2006 Daily Journal DAR 12525
  • 2006 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8760
  • 2006 Cal. App. LEXIS 1389

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying test for violations of § 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act to evaluate unfair business acts or practices
  • setting out the FTC test as requiring 3 “(1) the consumer injury must be substantial; (2) the injury must not be outweighed by any 4 countervailing benefits to consumers or competition; and (3) it must be an injury that consumers 5 themselves could not reasonably have avoided.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Flier, Rubin, Boland

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.