Camacho v. 1440 Rhode Island Avenue Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ‘‘[I]t must appear that ... the separateness of the [dominant figure] and the corporation has ceased and '... an adherence to the fiction of the separate existence of the corporation would ... promote injustice.” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• “[sufficient participation can exist where there is an act or omission by the officer which logically leads to the inference that he or she had a share in the wrongful acts of the corporation which constitute the offense” [internal quotation marks omitted]
• “An agent who does an act otherwise a tort is not relieved from liability by the fact that he acted at the command of the principal or on account of the principal.” (quoting Restatement (Second) of Agency § 343 (1984))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).