Skip to main content
· 3/14/1921

Camac v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.

Citations

  • 269 Pa. 543
  • 112 A. 766
  • 1921 Pa. LEXIS 606

Syllabus

<p>Negligence — Street railways — Wagon—Right-angled collision— Contributory negligence — Case for court.</p> <p>1. Where a driver of a heavily laden wagon turns to cross, into a side street, a double-track street railway on the street on which he has been driving, and knows that a street car is approaching towards him on the far track within the block, nevertheless drives on to such track without further looking, and is struck, he is guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law.</p> <p>2. In such ease, where there is no dispute as to the facts, or inferences to be drawn from them, it is the duty of the court to declare plaintiff guilty of contributory negligence.</p>

Judges: Kephart, Sadler, Schaffer, Simpson, Walling

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.