Camac v. Hall

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ruling on coverage dispute “[a]fter a review of the entire record”
• an intentional attack was an accident from the victim's point of view because \the plaintiff was slugged by the defendant while at the urinal on personal business. It is not usual or expected to be struck at such a time.\
• “When a person clearly intends the act that causes the other person’s injuries, and the resulting injuries are reasonably foreseeable, Delaware law clearly states that a court must give effect to liability coverage exclusion clauses in homeowner insurance contracts.”’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).