Calvo v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that McGirt “shall not apply retroactively to void a conviction that was final when McGirt was decided.”
• “[W]e now hold that McGirt. . . shall not apply retroactively to void a conviction that was final when McGirt was decided.”
• “[W]e now hold that McGirt and our post-McGirt decisions recognizing these reservations shall not apply retroactively to void a conviction that was final when McGirt was decided.”
• “[W]e now hold that McGirt and our post-McGirt decisions recognizing these reservations shall not apply retroactively to void a conviction that was final when McGirt was decided.”
• court did not explicitly decide whether it would continue to apply watershed exception but spoke of exception in past tense and predicted that ‘‘such a rule is unlikely ever to be announced’’
• link to document # 1050468715

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).