Skip to main content
· 5/15/2002

Calvit v. Procter & Gamble Manufacturing Co.

Citations

  • 207 F. Supp. 2d 527
  • 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16366
  • 2002 WL 1378802

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • excluding testimony of human factors expert where adequacy of warning was factual issue that jury could handle without expert help
  • “The adequacy of the warning is a factual issue which the jury can handle without expert help from either side.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: John v. Parker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.