Calvin Turner v. Department of Agriculture

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, although a state may develop its own search and seizure law, the state may not authorize police conduct that infringes Fourth Amendment rights
• ruling that the officer “must be able to point to particular facts from which he reason ably inferred that the individual was armed and dangerous”
• holding that defendant had substantial stake in judgment of conviction that survived completion of sentence imposed upon him
• holding that reaching into pockets without first conducting a pat down search was improper under the circumstances
• holding that reaching into pockets without first conducting a pat down search was improper under the circumstances
• holding that an officer who reached into a pocket and found narcotics without first detecting a weapon exceeded the bounds of a lawful Terry search

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).