Calvin JONES, Petitioner-Appellant, v. A.A. GOMEZ, Warden, and John K. Van De Kamp, Respondents-Appellees

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that district court properly rejected conclusory claim that was argued 28 in a single page without reference to the record or any other documents
• finding that a habeas “petition must contain specific and particularized facts, not 6 conclusory or general remarks”
• denying 11 habeas relief because the petitioner’s “conclusory allegations did not meet the specificity 12 requirement”
• finding habeas relief was unwarranted based on “conclusory allegations which are not supported by a statement of specific facts”
• finding 26 conclusory allegations with no reference to the record are insufficient to support habeas 27 relief
• rejecting Brady claim where petitioner provided only conclusory 2 allegations unsupported by specific facts

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).