Skip to main content
· 12/12/1973

Calvert v. Zanes-Ewalt Warehouse, Inc.

Citations

  • 502 S.W.2d 689
  • 17 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 122
  • 1973 Tex. LEXIS 223

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that “the accomplishment of regular and dependable delivery to ... customers ... by means of [a] pool maintained in [a] warehouse” was a “business advantage,” not a transportation-related purpose, in the eyes of the Commerce Clause
  • recognizing that “the accomplishment of regular and dependable delivery to ... customers ... by means of [a] pool maintained in [a] warehouse” was a “business advantage,” not a transportation-related purpose, in the eyes of the Commerce Clause
  • recognizing that “the accomplishment of regular and dependable delivery to . . . customers . . . by means of [a] pool maintained in [a] warehouse” was a “business advantage,” not a transportation-related purpose, in the eyes of the Commerce Clause
  • explaining that delaying transportation to better meet future demand does not render a stoppage transitory
  • explaining that delaying transportation to better meet future demand does not render a stoppage transitory
  • explaining that delaying transportation to better meet future demand does not render a stoppage transitory

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Steakley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.