Skip to main content
· 6/30/2005

Calvert v. Scharf

Citations

  • 619 S.E.2d 197
  • 217 W. Va. 684
  • 2005 W. Va. LEXIS 77

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Without the requisite causal connection between an attorney's malpractice and a loss to the client, a malpractice case simply cannot go forward.”
  • The Supreme Court need not answer all of the questions certified to it where it was only necessary to answer one question to resolve the issue in question

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Davis, Maynard, Benjamin, Jolliffe

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.