Calvao v. Town of Framingham

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming the district court’s conclusion that any omission on the part of the defendant in responding to the plaintiffs’ interrogatories was rendered harmless by the fact that the plaintiff had received the same information earlier in the case
• “On the undisputed facts, the Town’s actions were sufficient to establish a qualifying work period, despite the asserted lack of notice to its employees.”
• \This Court has stated that in interpreting a will `[e]xtrinsic evidence is not admissible to vary

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).