Calva v. Attorney General of the United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[ajfter considering the cases discussed above, this Court is not persuaded by the analysis in Heins” and “this Court finds that there is no requirement in [the similar language statute] that the beneficiary be a dependent of the deceased-insured.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).