Calpetco 1981, a Limited Partnership v. Marshall Exploration, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding mere disagreement is not enough, evidence must be such that jury could return a verdict for nonmoving 5 party
• “if the district court was required to reconsider [an interlocutory order] simply because [the losing party] belatedly came forward with evidence not submitted prior to the ruling[,] ... the cycle of reconsideration would be never-ending”
• “mere disagreement” between parties is not enough to create a genuine dispute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).