· 1/19/2000
Calogero v. Safeway Ins. Co. of Louisiana
Citations
- 753 So. 2d 170
- 2000 WL 39134
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting “primary difference” is 30- vs. 60-day period in which insurer must pay
- “[Wjhere the insurer has legitimate doubts about coverage, the insurer has the right to litigate these questionable claims without being subjected to damages and penalties.”
- recovery of statutory damages under R.S. 22:1973 did not preclude recovery of attorney fees under R.S. 22:1892
- Louisiana Insurance Code provisions are mutually exclusive in that plaintiff cannot recover under both
- “An insurer does not act arbitrarily and capriciously … when it withholds payments based on a genuine (good faith) dispute about the amount of a loss or the applicability of coverage.”
- “This holding is not in conflict with the court of appeals’ correct legal finding that where La. R.S. 22:1220 provides the greater penalty, La. R.S. 22:1220 supersedes La. R.S. 22:658 such that Ca-logero cannot recover penalties under both statutes.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Victory
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.