Skip to main content
· 12/6/2001

Calogera Abbruscato v. Empire Blue Cross And Blue Shield

Citations

  • 274 F.3d 90

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • remanding claim to district court, where plaintiffs had sufficiently demonstrated the four basic elements of promissory es-toppel, plus “extraordinary circumstances” to avoid summary judgment
  • test is whether the plan documents contain language that could “reasonably be interpreted as a promise.”
  • referring to this principle as “contractual vesting

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.