Calnimptewa v. Flagstaff Police Department

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• appellate opinions should not be read as authority for matters not “specifically presented and discussed”
• appellate opinions should not be read as authority for matters not \specifically presented and discussed\
• “[I]t is always inappropriate to read an appellate opinion as authority for matters neither specifically presented and discussed, nor even accorded footnote mention.”
• appellate opinions should not be read “as authority for matters [that are not] specifically presented and discussed”
• “[W]e are not authorized to supply words that would extend the scope of a statute beyond that intended by the legislature.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).