Calmes v. Carruth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that defendant’s identification of prior art placed the plaintiff on notice of a potential affirmative defense at trial
• holding that the defendant counterclaimant could not rely on the plaintiff’s complaint and dismissing counterclaim for declaration of invalidity where it failed to assert any facts showing how the patent was anticipated or obvious
• dismissing invalidity counterclaim where the defendant only identified, but did not describe, an invalidating prior art, and did not put the plaintiff on notice of any limitation the defendant contended the prior art shared with the plaintiff’s patent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).