Skip to main content

Calloway v. State

Citations

  • 810 S.E.2d 105

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that OCGA § 16-1-8 (c) imposes “a statutory limitation to some successive prosecutions”
  • “The proof necessary to establish possession with intent to distribute is (1) possession of a controlled substance and (2) the in- tent to distribute it.”
  • OCGA § 16-13-30 requires same mens rea as similar federal statute, even though requirement is not express
  • OCGA § 16-13-30 requires same mens rea as similar federal statute, even though requirement is not express

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Peterson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.