Calloway v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “There are no ‘fixed or immutable signs that always’ require a competency hearing. . . . The trial court must 2 consider all the circumstances, including defense counsel’s representations.”
• requiring consideration of the totality of the relevant circumstances

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Medina v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1997-02-10· cited 19×
• Brockman v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-08-08· cited 18×
• Kent v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-12-05· cited 11×
• Mairena v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-03-06· cited 10×
• Pickles v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-03-19· cited 7×
• Joshua Leon Walker v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-02-08· cited 3×
• Rafael Heribe Avilesrosario v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-12-17· cited 2×
• Gerome Berry v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-02-08· cited 2×
• Jones v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-01-08· cited 1×
• Orosco v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-07-07
• Petrena v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-10-25

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Dusky v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1960-04-18· cited 3,197×
• Drope v. Missouri
  Supreme Court· 1975-02-19· cited 2,695×
• Lane v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1980-09-25· cited 106×
• Tingle v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1988-12-01· cited 93×
• Scott v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1982-09-30· cited 43×
• Shaw v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-07-27· cited 5×