Skip to main content
· 9/27/1966

Callihan v. Talkowski

Citations

  • 4 Mich. App. 320
  • 144 N.W.2d 811
  • 1966 Mich. App. LEXIS 540

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that prohibition cannot be used \to review the regularity of an act already performed\
  • prohibition is not a substitute for an appeal
  • prohibition is not a substitute for an appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fitzgerald, Gillis, Holbrook

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.