Calligar v. Fradkoff

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• specific performance was not available to a purchaser where the seller was “unable” to convey property in accordance with contract terms due to events beyond the control of the seller
• specific performance was not available to a purchaser where the seller was “unable” to convey property in accordance with contract terms due to events beyond the control of the seller

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Progressive Solar Concepts, Inc. v. Gabes
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1990-05-29· cited 8×
• Sioris v. 25 West 43rd Street Co.
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1996-01-25· cited 5×
• Emptage & Associates, Inc. v. Cape Hampton, LLC
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2005-06-20· cited 4×
• Cipriano v. Glen Cove Lodge 1458
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2002-09-16· cited 3×
• Andersen v. Ferdinand
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2005-04-11

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Tahini Investments, Ltd. v. Bobrowsky
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1984-01-09· cited 44×
• S.E.S. Importers, Inc. v. Pappalardo
  New York Court of Appeals· 1981-07-07· cited 32×
• Mokar Properties Corp. v. Hall
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1958-11-25· cited 32×
• Most v. Monti
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1982-12-06· cited 26×
• J. R. Stevenson Corp. v. County of Westchester
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1985-09-30· cited 22×
• Mancini-Ciolo, Inc. v. Scaramellino
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1986-03-24· cited 5×