Skip to main content
· 7/27/1995

Callier v. Warden

Citations

  • 901 P.2d 619
  • 111 Nev. 976
  • 1995 Nev. LEXIS 102

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining the four required components for granting a motion for a new trial based upon a recantation
  • explaining the four required components for granting a motion for a new trial based upon a recantation
  • explaining the four required components for granting a motion for a new trial based upon a recantation
  • explaining the factors relevant to a motion for a new trial based upon a recantation
  • “The district court appropriately considered [the] witnesses’ refusal to testify under oath and subject themselves to cross-examination in concluding that their recantations were not credible.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.