· 7/27/1995
Callier v. Warden
Citations
- 901 P.2d 619
- 111 Nev. 976
- 1995 Nev. LEXIS 102
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining the four required components for granting a motion for a new trial based upon a recantation
- explaining the four required components for granting a motion for a new trial based upon a recantation
- explaining the four required components for granting a motion for a new trial based upon a recantation
- explaining the factors relevant to a motion for a new trial based upon a recantation
- “The district court appropriately considered [the] witnesses’ refusal to testify under oath and subject themselves to cross-examination in concluding that their recantations were not credible.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.