Callaway Golf Co. v. Acushnet Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding the probative value of a copending reexamination marginal and the effect likely to be highly prejudicial
• finding district court did not abuse its discretion in excluding evidence regarding non-final reexamination de- terminations from jury
• finding district court did not abuse its discretion in excluding evidence regarding non-final reexamination de- terminations from jury
• “A broader independent claim cannot be nonobvious where a depend- ent claim stemming from that independent claim is invalid for obviousness.”
• incorporation by reference requires that the host document “contain language clearly identifying the subject matter which is incorporated and where it is to be found”
• “A broader independent claim cannot be nonobvious where a depend- ent claim stemming from that independent claim is invalid for obviousness.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).