Supreme Court· 4/11/1932

Callahan v. United States

Citations

285 U.S. 515
52 S. Ct. 454
76 L. Ed. 914
1932 U.S. LEXIS 449

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that \contrary to law\ in the Tariff Act of 1922 is an unqualified phrase meaning contrary to any law
importation contrary to the National Prohibition Act

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Roberts

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.