Skip to main content

Callahan v. State

Citations

  • 502 S.W.2d 3
  • 1973 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2126

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • evidence sufficient to support burglary conviction despite lack of fingerprint evidence
  • “Appellant calls attention to the fact that there were no fingerprints discovered and that he was not found inside the store. . . . [O]n appeal these facts are not enough for this court to overturn the jury’s verdict.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Onion

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

40 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.