Callahan v. Pennsylvania State Police

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a letter notifying trooper that his benefits would be terminated did not constitute an adjudication triggering the 30-day appeal period because the trooper was never afforded a hearing
• holding that a letter notifying trooper that his benefits would be terminated did not constitute an adjudication triggering the 30-day appeal period because the trooper was never afforded a hearing
• holding that an adjudicatory letter that failed to comply with the statutory requirements of notice and an opportunity to be heard was not valid and therefore did not provide a basis for appeal under the Local Agency Law
• holding that an adjudicatory letter that failed to comply with the statutory requirements of notice and an opportunity to be heard was not valid and therefore did not provide a basis for appeal under the Local Agency Law
• necessity of providing a claimant with a Heart and Lung Act hearing to determine permanency of disability
• right of judicial review of an administrative decision occurs only after an adjudication as defined by 2 Pa.C.S. § 504

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).