Callahan v. Division of Highways

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that a union’s failure to obtain “potentially exonerating documents” was merely a tactical or negligent error
• finding that a union’s failure to obtain discovery of potentially exonerating documents did not qualify as conduct sufficiently arbitrary to satisfy the first element of DFR breach
• affirming lower court’s grant of defendants’ motion to dismiss, noting that “the Union may have committed a tactical (or even a negligent) error, [but] such an error, even if established, does not constitute a breach of the Union’s duty.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).