Callahan v. City and County of San Francisco

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• posing similar hypothetical and criticizing rule defining dangerous condition in terms of plaintiffs or third person’s due care because “[sjueh a holding would bar liability of the governmental unit in many cases affecting wholly blameless parties.”
• posing similar hypothetical and criticizing rule defining dangerous condition in terms of plaintiff's or third person's due care because \[s]uch a holding would bar liability of the governmental unit in many cases affecting wholly blameless parties.\
• “Plaintiff does not say, and is not required to say, that the driver with whom she was riding was exercising due care---- There is logic, as well as the quoted commentaries, in favor of appellant’s position that section 830, subdivision (a

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).