Call Center Technologies, Inc. v. Grand Adventures Tour & Travel Publishing Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that nondiverse, dispensable parties may be dismissed under Rule 21 at any time, so long as doing so does not cause prejudice
• stating that evidence that “Interline assumed several of GATT’s liabilities in addition to acquiring its assets” is a consideration in the continuity of assets factor
• “[T]he nonmoving party must come forward with admissible evidence sufficient to raise a genuine issue of fact for trial in order to avoid summary judgment.”
• “[T]he nonmoving party must come forward with admissible evidence sufficient to raise a genuine issue of fact for trial in order to avoid summary judgment.”
• “[T]he nonmoving party must come forward with admissible evidence sufficient to raise a genuine issue of fact for trial in order to avoid summary judgment.” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• “Because the ‘general rule’ is that a purchaser of assets does not assume the predecessor’s liability, it follows that the proponent of successor liability must offer proof that one of the [] exceptions to the general rule applies.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).