CALKINS, DENNIS J., PEOPLE v

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• mentioning that “true threats” are one of the recognized “unprotected” categories of speech
• mentioning that “true threats” are one of the recognized “unprotected” categories of speech
• mentioning that “true threats” are one of the recognized “unprotected” categories of speech
• stalking statute content based because determination that defendant knew or should have known statements would cause a reasonable person to suffer emotional distress cannot be made without reference to content
• speech integral to criminal conduct exception was inapplicable because ‘‘speech itself was the crime’’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).