Calixte and Petit-Frere v. Federal National Mortgage Assoc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that an agency had unlawfully done what the “Executive cannot do directly; amend the INA”
• explaining that while a court cannot review a presidential proclamation under the APA, it can review the validity of a rule that incorporates that proclamation
• finding that nonprofit organizations that provide legal assistance to asylum seekers fall within the zone of interests protected by the INA
• finding that asylum-seekers did not have standing to assert a right to cross the border illegally
• noting plaintiff need only establish risk or threat of injury to satisfy actual injury requirement
• collecting authority holding that discretionary denial of asylum cannot, as a matter of law, be based solely on manner of entry

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).