Caliguri v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• acknowledging that, under Rule 35, all parties have the right to a report following “a pathologist’s or other expert’s examination of tissue samples taken from the body of a person who is now deceased”
• explaining how decision to suppress testimony from consulting experts “who could not make a definitive diagnosis [of mesothelioma]” could mislead jury “regarding the truth of [the] plaintiff’s condition”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).