Skip to main content
· 9/6/2011

Californians for Alternatives to Toxics v. United States Fish & Wildlife Service

Citations

  • 814 F. Supp. 2d 992
  • 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 99966
  • 2011 WL 3915966

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[T]he necessity lies in the use of the otherwise prohibited activity, here the use of motorized equipment [and the installation of a permanent structure], and not the merits of the proposed project.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Frank C. Damrell, Jr.

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.