· 7/2/1981
California v. Silvey
Citations
- 453 U.S. 918
- 101 S. Ct. 3153
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding supplemental report violated Rule 26(e) “by 15 enriching the initial expert report with detail that was admittedly available to [p]laintiff’s 16 expert at the time she drafted the initial expert report”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.