Skip to main content
· 2/24/1969

California v. Sesslin

Citations

  • 393 U.S. 1080
  • 89 S. Ct. 850

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure “make no provision for suits by persons using fictitious names or for anonymous plaintiffs” and, thus, courts allow it only in “certain limited circumstances”
  • remanding to the district court “with directions to permit an amended complaint which outlines in clear, direct and understandable terms the precise factual allegations to support each essential element of these claims”
  • plaintiff cannot avoid federal government’s sovereign immunity simply by naming individual officers and employees as defendants

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.