California RSA No. 4 v. Madera County

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting absence of Ninth Circuit authority but accepting plaintiff’s concession “the burden should be on the communications company”
• rejecting as substantial evidence fears or concerns that were “objectively unreasonable, speculative, and not supported by the record”
• noting generalized fears, particularly when opposed by expert testimony, do not amount to substantial evidence
• applying Occidental 4 standard to review of local government’s denial of conditional use permit

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).