California Research Corp. v. Ladd

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Requiring parties to disclose only those witnesses they subjectively intend 22 to use in substantiating their claims, rather than those they merely ‘may use’ as Rule 26 explicitly 23 requires, would erode the efficacy of the rule's disclosure requirements.”
• “where a witness has been alluded to in the same litigation, not different litigation, 8 that a party's failure to disclose a witness has been considered harmless”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).