California Pharmacists Ass'n v. Maxwell-Jolly

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that we review de novo the district court’s legal conclusions
• holding that we review de novo the district court’s legal conclusions
• balance of equities and public interest weighed in favor of Medi-Cal providers where the impact of the injunction on the State’s budget crisis would be minimal
• balance of equities and public interest weighed in favor of Medi-Cal providers where the impact of the injunction on the State’s budget crisis would be minimal
• “Typically, monetary harm does not constitute irreparable harm. . . . 13 [E]conomic damages are not traditionally considered irreparable because the injury can later be 14 remedied by a damage award.”
• “Typically, 19 monetary harm does not constitute irreparable harm. . . . [E]conomic damages are not 20 traditionally considered irreparable because the injury can later be remedied by a damage 21 award.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).