Skip to main content
· 2/26/2009

California Parents for the Equalization of Educational Materials v. Noonan

Citations

  • 600 F. Supp. 2d 1088
  • 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15889
  • 2009 WL 498978

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that CAPEEM’s challenges to public school text books were barred by Monteiro
  • challenged materials \are only a small portion of otherwise clearly nonreligious texts ... which are part of a clearly[ ] nonreligious history-social sciences program.\
  • \CAPEEM must show that an objective sixth grade student ...\
  • rejecting use of experts in favor of hypothetical observer
  • material does not \serve as a religious primer.\
  • rejecting “various expert opinions” offered by both parties

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Damrell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.