California Packing Corp. v. Transport Indemnity Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a Aforklift@ was covered by the policy language, in part because the parties conceded a forklift was a Aland motor vehicle@
• holding that a “forklift” was covered by the policy language, in part because the parties conceded a forklift was a \land motor vehicle\
• “Where general and specific provisions of an insurance policy differ as to its coverage or applicability, the specific provisions will prevail”
• “Where general and specific provisions of an insurance policy differ as to its coverage or applicability, the specific provisions will prevail”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).